Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Fourth Circuit


US v. Hargrove, 08-5223

Conviction and sentence of defendant for attempted transfer of obscenity to a minor, transfer of child pornography, and attempted enticement of a minor, are affirmed where: 1) the district court did not err in denying defendant's motion to suppress because a January 2007 interview did not constitute a "custodial interrogation" that invoked his right to be read Miranda warnings; and 2) defendant has not shown that the district court plainly erred and that resentencing is required as he cannot show that he would have received a lower sentence had the district court not also mentioned that the victim incurred further harm by testifying at trial.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 09/21/2010
  • Decided 11/19/2010
  • Published 11/19/2010

Judges

Court

  • United States Fourth Circuit

Counsel

Copied to clipboard