United States Fourth Circuit

In an action by two former coal miners to collect retirement health benefits allegedly owed to them by their former employer, the judgment of the district court's decision upholding the arbitrator's judgment in favor of the plaintiffs is affirmed as the Resolution of Dispute opinions (RODs) deserve the usual deferential review.

Appellate Information

• Argued 03/24/2010
• Decided 05/05/2010
• Published 05/05/2010

Judges

• Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Fourth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• ARGUED:John R. Woodrum, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Bradley James Pyles, Pyles & Turner, LLP, Logan, West Virginia, for Appellees. ON BRIEF:W. Gregory Mott, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellant.