United States Fourth Circuit

In suit by equipment manufacturers against equipment dealers arising from a contract dispute, summary judgment against plaintiff as to its liability to one dealer defendant under the Arkansas Franchise Practices Act, and jury's decision not to make a damage award to one of dealer defendants, are affirmed as the court did not err in the remand proceedings.

Appellate Information

• Decided 12/20/2007
• Published 12/20/2007

Judges

• Before TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges, and LEGG, Chief United States District Judge for the District of Maryland, sitting by designation.

Court

• United States Fourth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• ARGUED:  Scott E. Korzenowski, Dady & Garner, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota, for Appellant/Cross-Appellee.  Michael J. Lockerby, Foley & Lardner, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for Appellees/Cross-Appellants.   ON BRIEF:  J. Michael Dady, Ronald K. Gardner, Dady & Garner, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota;  Edward L. Bleynat, Jr., Ferikes & Bleynat, P.L.L.C., Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellant/Cross-Appellee.  Vineeta A. Bathia, Foley & Lardner, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for Appellees/Cross-Appellants.