United States Fourth Circuit
Goodman v. Praxair, Inc., 06-1009
Dismissal of amended complaint for breach of contract is reversed where the district court erred in applying Maryland's three-year statute of limitations and in refusing to apply the relation back afforded by Rule 15(c), Fed. R. Civ. P., when plaintiff named the corporate subsidiary as a defendant.
Appellate Information
- Decided 07/25/2007
- Published 07/25/2007
Judges
- Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, TRAXLER, KING, GREGORY, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Fourth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- ARGUED: Thomas McCarthy, Jr., Thomas McCarthy, Sr. & Associates, P.C., Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellant. Howard Robert Rubin, Sonnenschein, Nath & Rosenthal, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for Appellees. ON BRIEF: Amy L. Bess, William E. Copley, Sonnenschein, Nath & Rosenthal, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for Appellees.