United States Fourth Circuit
Barry v. Gonzales, 05-1219
Denial of motion to reopen by BIA is affirmed where petitioner: 1) relies on evidence that was available in her initial deportation proceeding; and 2) did not comply with the requirements of Matter of Lozada, 19 I. & N. Dec. 637 (BIA 1988), in asserting her ineffective assistance of counsel claim.
Appellate Information
- Argued 03/15/2006
- Decided 04/19/2006
- Published 04/19/2006
Judges
- Before MICHAEL, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Fourth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- ARGUED: Danielle L.C. Beach-Oswald, Noto & Oswald, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Kristin Kay Edison, United States Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. ON BRIEF: Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division, Michelle E. Gorden, Senior Litigation Counsel, United States Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.