United States Fourth Circuit
Menghesha v. Gonzales, 04-1716
A petition for review of a denial of an asylum application is granted where the immigration judge erred as a matter of law in holding petitioner to an overly stringent legal standard: proving that political persecution was the government's sole motive.
Appellate Information
- Argued 11/29/2005
- Decided 03/13/2006
- Published 03/13/2006
Judges
- Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Fourth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- ARGUED: David Allen Garfield, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Theodore Charles Hirt, Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. ON BRIEF: Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division, Margaret Perry, Senior Litigation, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.