United States Fourth Circuit

Defendant's convictions for illegal possession of a firearm and possession of stolen firearms is reversed where the district court erred in denying his Rule 29 motion challenging the sufficiency of the evidence.

Appellate Information

• Argued 03/16/2006
• Decided 09/09/2005
• Published 09/09/2005

Judges

• Before WILKINS, Chief Judge, WIDENER, WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, LUTTIG,WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, MOTZ, TRAXLER, KING, GREGORY, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Court

• United States Fourth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• ARGUED:  William Scott Little, Stark & Little, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant.  Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.   ON BRIEF:  Thomas M. DiBiagio, United States Attorney, George L. Russell, III, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.