United States Fourth Circuit
Mudd v. Barnhart, 04-1416
In a suit for social security benefits, the district court did not err when it considered the time a lawyer spent representing plaintiff at the administrative stage as a factor in determining that a contingency fee agreement was reasonable under 42 U.S.C. section 406(b).
Appellate Information
- Argued 03/16/2005
- Decided 08/15/2005
- Published 08/15/2005
Judges
- Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and JAMES R. SPENCER, Chief United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, sitting by designation.
Court
- United States Fourth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- ARGUED: Joshua Paul Waldman, United States Department of Justice, Civil Division, Appellate Staff, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. James E. Hutchins, Mathews, Virginia, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, John L. Brownlee, United States Attorney, William Kanter, Michael E. Robinson, United States Department of Justice, Civil Division, Appellate Staff, Washington, D.C., for Appellant.