Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Fourth Circuit


Mudd v. Barnhart, 04-1416

In a suit for social security benefits, the district court did not err when it considered the time a lawyer spent representing plaintiff at the administrative stage as a factor in determining that a contingency fee agreement was reasonable under 42 U.S.C. section 406(b).

Appellate Information

  • Argued 03/16/2005
  • Decided 08/15/2005
  • Published 08/15/2005

Judges

  • Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and JAMES R. SPENCER, Chief United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, sitting by designation.

Court

  • United States Fourth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • ARGUED:  Joshua Paul Waldman, United States Department of Justice, Civil Division, Appellate Staff, Washington, D.C., for Appellant.   James E. Hutchins, Mathews, Virginia, for Appellee.   ON BRIEF:  Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, John L. Brownlee, United States Attorney, William Kanter, Michael E. Robinson, United States Department of Justice, Civil Division, Appellate Staff, Washington, D.C., for Appellant.
Copied to clipboard