United States Fourth Circuit
Martin v. Am. Bancorp. Retirement Plan, 04-1559
In a suit for pension benefits under ERISA, judgment in favor of defendant-Plan Administrator is reversed where the district court erred when it ruled that plaintiff's claims were barred by res judicata.
Appellate Information
- Decided 05/11/2005
- Published 05/11/2005
Judges
- Before WIDENER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Fourth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- ARGUED:Patrick Stanley Cassidy, CASSIDY, Myers, Cogan, Voegelin & Tennant, L.C., Wheeling, West Virginia, For Appellants. John Porco, Schrader, Byrd & Companion, P.L.L.C., Wheeling, West Virginia; Cynthia B. Jones, Steptoe & Johnson, Morgantown, West Virginia, For Appellees. On Brief:Thomas M. Cunningham, Cassidy, Myers, Cogan, Voegelin & Tennant, L.C., Wheeling, West Virginia, For Appellants. Sara E. Hauptfuehrer, Steptoe & Johnson, Morgantown, West Virginia, For Appellee American Bancorporation; Ray A. Byrd, Schrader, Byrd & Companion, P.L.L.C., Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees American Bancorporation Retirement Plan and Brent E. Richmond.