United States Fourth Circuit

Defendant unsuccessfully appealed his conviction for perjury on the grounds that evidence should have been suppressed based on of Fifth and Sixth Amendment violations, because the remedy for such violations does not include exclusion of false testimony.

Appellate Information

• Decided 06/24/2004
• Published 06/24/2004

Judges

• Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Fourth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• ARGUED:Randy Virlin Cargill, Magee, Foster, Goldstein & Sayers, P.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant.  Joseph William Hooge Mott, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. ON BRIEF:  John L. Brownlee, United States Attorney, Brian Samuels, Third Year Law Intern, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.