United States Fourth Circuit

Summary judgment for defendant on employee's sex discrimination claim is affirmed, as is the judgment, after trial, in favor of defendant on her retaliation claim. Though transferred to a job that may not have been as challenging or satisfying as her previous one, she did not suffer an adverse employment action.

Appellate Information

• Decided 03/16/2004
• Published 03/16/2004

Judges

• Before WIDENER and KING, Circuit Judges, and Margaret B. SEYMOUR, United States District Judge for the District of South Carolina, sitting by designation.

Court

• United States Fourth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• ARGUED:John F. Karl, Jr., McDONALD & KARL, Washington, D.C., for Appellant.  Albert David Copperthite, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. ON BRIEF:  Bradley G. McDonald, Jodi T. Tuer, MCDONALD & KARL, Washington, D.C., for Appellant.  Lynne A. Battaglia, United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.