United States Fourth Circuit

A preponderance of the evidence proved that plaintiff had trafficked in food stamps; for example, his grocery store occasionally collected more in food stamp reinbursements than he reported in total sales. Summary judgment for defendant is affirmed.

Appellate Information

• Decided 03/08/2004
• Published 03/08/2004

Judges

• Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Fourth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• ARGUED:William Webb Plyler, McMillan, Smith & Plyler, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant.  Neal Irving Fowler, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. ON BRIEF:  Frank D. Whitney, United States Attorney, Anne M. Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.