Skip to main content

United States Fourth Circuit


WADE v. ROBINSON, 01-7768

Although the district court did misapply section 2244(d)(1), which challenges the state's rescindment of his good conduct credits upon his parole revocation, petitioner's contention that his is not a challenge to a state court judgment, is without merit. His petition is still untimely under a correct calculation of the limitation period.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 04/22/2003
  • Published 04/22/2003

Judges

  • Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Fourth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • ARGUED:Christie Ann Leary, Greenspun & Mann, P.C., Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellant.  William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Division of Public Safety & Enforcement, Office Of The Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.   ON BRIEF: ON BRIEF:  Jerry W. Kilgore, Attorney General, Division of Public Safety & Enforcement, Office Of The Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Copied to clipboard