United States Fourth Circuit
US v. WORRELL, 01-4857
The district court did not erroneously exclude expert testimony on an unmedicated medical condition, in convicting defendant for mailing threatening communications under 18 U.S.C.A. section 876. A sentence enhancement for conduct evidencing intent to carry out threats was correct.
Appellate Information
- Decided 12/17/2002
- Published 12/17/2002
Judges
- Before TRAXLER, Circuit Judge, HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge, and HILTON, Chief United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, sitting by designation.
Court
- United States Fourth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- ARGUED: George Alan DuBois, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Dennis M. Duffy, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. John Stuart Bruce, United States Attorney, Anne M. Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.