Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Fourth Circuit


US v. WORRELL, 01-4857

The district court did not erroneously exclude expert testimony on an unmedicated medical condition, in convicting defendant for mailing threatening communications under 18 U.S.C.A. section 876. A sentence enhancement for conduct evidencing intent to carry out threats was correct.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 12/17/2002
  • Published 12/17/2002

Judges

  • Before TRAXLER, Circuit Judge, HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge, and HILTON, Chief United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, sitting by designation.

Court

  • United States Fourth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • ARGUED:  George Alan DuBois, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant.  Dennis M. Duffy, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.   ON BRIEF:  Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant.   John Stuart Bruce, United States Attorney, Anne M. Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Copied to clipboard