Skip to main content

United States Fourth Circuit


US v. CARRINGTON, 99-4537

Though a sentence based on 1) an indictment that failed to specify drug quantity and 2) absence of a jury finding as to quantity, was plain error under Apprendi, sentence is affirmed where evidence of drug quantity justifying the sentence was overwhelming and uncontroverted.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 06/06/2002
  • Decided 08/22/2002
  • Published 08/22/2002

Judges

  • Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Fourth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • ARGUED:  Krysia Carmel Nelson, Nelson & Korth, P.L.C., Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellant.  Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.   ON BRIEF:  John L. Brownlee, United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Copied to clipboard