United States Fourth Circuit
US v. CARRINGTON, 99-4537
Though a sentence based on 1) an indictment that failed to specify drug quantity and 2) absence of a jury finding as to quantity, was plain error under Apprendi, sentence is affirmed where evidence of drug quantity justifying the sentence was overwhelming and uncontroverted.
Appellate Information
- Argued 06/06/2002
- Decided 08/22/2002
- Published 08/22/2002
Judges
- Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Fourth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- ARGUED: Krysia Carmel Nelson, Nelson & Korth, P.L.C., Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellant. Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: John L. Brownlee, United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.