Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Fourth Circuit


US v. PAULEY, 00-4359

Where the indictment to which appellant pled guilty did not specify any threshold quantity of drugs, such failure to charge and to consider in sentencing such a threshold quantity was plain error under Apprendi, where appellant received a sentence which exceeded by 20 years the maximum possible.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 01/25/2002
  • Decided 04/22/2002
  • Published 04/22/2002

Judges

  • Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Senior Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation.

Court

  • United States Fourth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • ARGUED:  David Robert Bungard, Robinson & McElwee, L.L.P., Charleston, West Virginia, for Defendant-Appellant.  John Castle Parr, Assistant United States Attorney, Huntington, West Virginia, for Plaintiff-Appellee.   ON BRIEF:  Rebecca A. Betts, United States Attorney, Stephanie Taylor, Student Intern, Huntington, West Virginia, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Copied to clipboard