United States Fourth Circuit
US v. VINYARD, 00-4442
Where the defendant's deception deprived his fraud victim of the chance to consider a variety of brokers and to search for the best possible price, it violates the honest services doctrine embodied in 18 USC 1346, so the fraud scheme exposed the victim to a reasonably foreseeable economic risk.
Appellate Information
- Argued 05/08/2001
- Decided 09/11/2001
- Published 09/12/2001
Judges
- Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Fourth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- ARGUED: Robert Eugene Breckenridge, II, Johnson, Hester, Walter & Breckenridge, L.L.P., Ottumwa, IA, for Appellant. Thomas Ernest Booth, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: J. Rene Josey, United States Attorney, Alfred W. Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, District of South Carolina, for Appellee.