Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Fourth Circuit


BARRON v. UNUM LIFE INS. CO. OF AMERICA, 01-1065

An ERISA plan administrator cannot, consistent with its fiduciary duty, rely on a general release executed by plaintiff, involving a different plan, to deny her plan benefits.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 06/05/2001
  • Decided 08/06/2001
  • Published 08/06/2001

Judges

  • Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and KEELEY, Chief United States District Judge for the Northern District of West Virginia, sitting by designation.

Court

  • United States Fourth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • ARGUED:  Stephen Mark Tilghman, Seidel, Baker & Tilghman, P.A., Salisbury, MD, for Plaintiff-Appellant. John Snowden Stanley, Jr., Semmes, Bowen & Semmes, Baltimore, MD, for Defendant-Appellee. ON BRIEF:  Edgar A. Baker, Jr., Seidel, Baker & Tilghman, P.A., Salisbury, MD, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Copied to clipboard