United States Fourth Circuit
BARRON v. UNUM LIFE INS. CO. OF AMERICA, 01-1065
An ERISA plan administrator cannot, consistent with its fiduciary duty, rely on a general release executed by plaintiff, involving a different plan, to deny her plan benefits.
Appellate Information
- Argued 06/05/2001
- Decided 08/06/2001
- Published 08/06/2001
Judges
- Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and KEELEY, Chief United States District Judge for the Northern District of West Virginia, sitting by designation.
Court
- United States Fourth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- ARGUED: Stephen Mark Tilghman, Seidel, Baker & Tilghman, P.A., Salisbury, MD, for Plaintiff-Appellant. John Snowden Stanley, Jr., Semmes, Bowen & Semmes, Baltimore, MD, for Defendant-Appellee. ON BRIEF: Edgar A. Baker, Jr., Seidel, Baker & Tilghman, P.A., Salisbury, MD, for Plaintiff-Appellant.