Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Fourth Circuit


US v. SITT, 99-2

Judge's failure to instruct the jury that they must unanimously agree about which crimes the defendant committed to find that defendant's conduct was part of a continuous criminal enterprise, but defendant was not prejudiced where the jury unanimously found him guilty of at least three predicate violations.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 10/30/2000
  • Decided 05/25/2001
  • Published 05/25/2001

Judges

  • Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Fourth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • ARGUED:Gerald Thomas Zerkin, Gerald T. Zerkin & Associates, Richmond, VA, for Appellant. Fernando Groene, Assistant United States Attorney, Darryl James Mitchell, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, VA, for Appellee. ON BRIEF:  Melanie H. Moore, Gerald T. Zerkin & Associates, Richmond, VA, for Appellant.  Helen F. Fahey, United States Attorney, Norfolk, VA, for Appellee.
Copied to clipboard