United States Fourth Circuit
US v. SITT, 99-2
Judge's failure to instruct the jury that they must unanimously agree about which crimes the defendant committed to find that defendant's conduct was part of a continuous criminal enterprise, but defendant was not prejudiced where the jury unanimously found him guilty of at least three predicate violations.
Appellate Information
- Argued 10/30/2000
- Decided 05/25/2001
- Published 05/25/2001
Judges
- Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Fourth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- ARGUED:Gerald Thomas Zerkin, Gerald T. Zerkin & Associates, Richmond, VA, for Appellant. Fernando Groene, Assistant United States Attorney, Darryl James Mitchell, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, VA, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Melanie H. Moore, Gerald T. Zerkin & Associates, Richmond, VA, for Appellant. Helen F. Fahey, United States Attorney, Norfolk, VA, for Appellee.