United States Fourth Circuit
ROGERS v. PENDLETON, 00-2130
Noise complaints, observation of persons "scurrying," and finding plaintiff in possession of a beer do not justify a search of plaintiff's curtilage or arrest of plaintiff for "impeding" the search.
Appellate Information
- Argued 02/26/2001
- Decided 05/04/2001
- Published 05/04/2001
Judges
- Before WILLIAMS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Senior Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation.
Court
- United States Fourth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- ARGUED: Jim Harold Guynn, Jr., Guynn & Dillon, P.C., Roanoke, VA, for Appellants. Randy Virlin Cargill, Magee, Foster, Goldstein & Sayers, P.C., Roanoke, VA, for Appellee.