Skip to main content

United States Fourth Circuit


ROGERS v. PENDLETON, 00-2130

Noise complaints, observation of persons "scurrying," and finding plaintiff in possession of a beer do not justify a search of plaintiff's curtilage or arrest of plaintiff for "impeding" the search.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 02/26/2001
  • Decided 05/04/2001
  • Published 05/04/2001

Judges

  • Before WILLIAMS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Senior Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation.

Court

  • United States Fourth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • ARGUED:  Jim Harold Guynn, Jr., Guynn & Dillon, P.C., Roanoke, VA, for Appellants.  Randy Virlin Cargill, Magee, Foster, Goldstein & Sayers, P.C., Roanoke, VA, for Appellee.
Copied to clipboard