Skip to main content

United States Fourth Circuit


MIGDAL v. ROWE PRICE-FLEMING INT'L, INC., 00-1420

Where plaintiffs did not address in any way the relationship between the fees that the advisers received and the services which they provided in return, they could not show that the fees charged were excessive in relation to the services provided.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 01/24/2001
  • Decided 05/01/2001
  • Published 05/01/2001

Judges

  • Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Fourth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • ARGUED:  Ronald Barry Rubin, Rubin & Monahan, Chartered, Rockville, MD, for Plaintiffs-Appellants. Daniel A. Pollack, Pollack & Kaminsky, New York, NY, for Defendants-Appellees. ON BRIEF:  Joel C. Feffer, Wechsler Harwood, Halebian & Feffer, L.L.P., New York, NY, for Appellants.  Anthony Zaccaria, Pollack & Kaminsky, New York, NY;  David Clarke, Jr., Piper Marbury, L.L.P., Washington, DC, for Defendants-Appellees.
Copied to clipboard