United States Fourth Circuit
MARY HELEN COAL CORP v. HUDSON, 99-2181
Fifth Amendment compensation for Coal Act premiums assessed against companies such as plaintiff must include prejudgment interest, and neither the absence of an authorizing statute nor ERISA's anti-inurement provision bars such an award.
Appellate Information
- Argued 10/31/2000
- Decided 12/19/2000
- Published 12/19/2000
Judges
- Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Fourth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- ARGUED: Patrick Michael McSweeney, McSweeney, Burtch & Crump, P.C., Richmond, VA, for Appellant. Peter Buscemi, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, L.L.P., Washington, DC, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: John L. Marshall, Jr., McSweeney, Burtch & Crump, P.C., Richmond, VA, for Appellant. David W. Allen, Office of the General, UMWA Health and Retirement Funds, John R. Mooney, Mooney, Green, Baker, Gibson & Saindon, P.C., Washington, DC; Samuel M. Brock, III, Mays & Valentine, L.L.P., Richmond, VA, for Appellees. John T. Montgomery, Robert Daniel O'Connor, Scott D. Pomfrett, Ropes & Gray, Boston, MA, for Amici Curiae.