United States Fourth Circuit
NLRB v. DORSEY TRAILERS INC, 99-1390
Evidence that new plant location would be more profitable is sufficient to show that company did not relocate a plant in order to retaliate against striking workers in violation of Section 8(a)(3) of the National Labor Relations Act.
Appellate Information
- Decided 12/01/2000
- Published 12/01/2000
Judges
- Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Fourth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- ARGUED: Michael S. Mitchell, Fisher & Phillips, L.L.P., New Orleans, LA, for Dorsey Trailers. David Arthur Fleischer, Senior Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, for Board. Stephen Anthony Yokich, Cornfield & Feldman, Chicago, IL, for Intervenors. ON BRIEFS: Scott D. Schneider, Fisher & Phillips, L.L.P., New Orleans, LA; James M. Walters, Fisher & Phillips, L.L.P., Atlanta, GA, for Dorsey Trailers. Linda Sher, Associate General, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, for Board.