United States Third Circuit

Co-defendants' convictions related to a scheme to fraudulently bid for Pennsylvania transportation projects as a disadvantaged business enterprise is affirmed where a shareholder lacks a reasonable expectation of privacy to challenge the search of corporate property unless he has shown a personal connection to the places searched and materials seized. Sentences are vacated and remanded for resentencing where the amount of loss defendants are responsible for is the face value of the contracts minus the fair market value of their services rendered instead of the face value of the fraudulently procured contracts.

Appellate Information

• Decided 09/30/2015
• Published 09/30/2015

Judges

• FISHER

Court

• United States Third Circuit

Counsel