United States Third Circuit
Erie Insurance Exchange v. Erie Indemnity Company, 13-1415
The district court's order remanding plaintiff's action for misappropriation of funds against defendant, who is plaintiff's attorney-in-fact and manages plaintiff's operations, is affirmed, where because this case was brought under state rules that bear no resemblance to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 in that they allow for suits by entities, not a conglomerate of individuals, it does not meet the statutory definition of "class action."
Appellate Information
- Decided 06/28/2013
- Published 06/28/2013
Judges
- FUENTES
Court
- United States Third Circuit