United States Third Circuit

Reset A A Font size: Print

Hagans v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 11-2526

In plaintiff's suit for Social Security disability insurance benefits, district court's decision affirming the Social Security Administration's (SSA) determination that he was no longer disabled is affirmed, as applying an appropriately high level of deference under Skidmore, the SSA's interpretation of section 423(f) is sufficiently persuasive to defer to it, and as such, district court properly held that the SSA correctly evaluated plaintiff's condition as of the date on which the agency first found his eligibility for benefits ceased.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 09/14/2012
  • Published 09/14/2012

Judges

  • Chagares

Court

  • United States Third Circuit

Counsel