United States Third Circuit

Reset A A Font size: Print

US v. Whiteford, 10-1023

In a prosecution of two Army reserve officers for conspiracy to participate in a bid-rigging scheme in Iraq, convictions and sentences are affirmed, where: 1) the evidence was sufficient for the conspiracy convictions; 2) the district court did not err in declining to grant the defendants new trials in the interest of justice; 3) the district court properly denied a motion to suppress statements one defendant made to the police after his arrest, and the weapons recovered from his house; 4) the district court's refusal to grant use immunity to a defense witness was not in error; and 5) the sentences were substantively reasonable.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 04/13/2012
  • Published 04/13/2012


  • Scirica


  • United States Third Circuit


  • For Appellant:
  • David P. Schroth I, Vijay Shanker

Copied to clipboard