United States Third Circuit
US v. Quiles, 09-1667
In a prosecution of defendants for money laundering and related crimes in connection with defendants' check cashing business, a denial of defendants' motions for a new trial is affirmed where: 1) the interest of justice does not require a new trial as the new evidence of defendants' principal adverse witness's indictment for child rape and other crimes is merely impeaching; 2) there was sufficient evidence to convict the daughter; 3) the father's sentence is affirmed as the district court conducted a full sentencing hearing and then sufficiently explained why it was imposing a below-guideline sentence of 60 months imprisonment.
Appellate Information
- Argued 06/23/2010
- Decided 08/17/2010
- Published 08/17/2010
Judges
Court
- United States Third Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Jonathan J. Sobel, Michael L. Levy