United States Third Circuit
Dee v. Borough of Dunmore, 07-1720
In a suit by a borough firefighter, alleging due-process violations by the borough council when it suspended him for allegedly failing to meet training requirements, summary judgment for defendants is vacated and remanded where: 1) plaintiff had a property interest in not being suspended without just cause; and 2) additional fact finding was required to determine whether plaintiff asserted a cognizable liberty interest based on his suspension and the related damage to his reputation.
Appellate Information
- Argued 03/25/2008
- Decided 12/04/2008
- Published 12/04/2008
Judges
- Before: McKEE, RENDELL, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Third Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Cynthia L. Pollick, Esq. [Argued], The Employment Law Firm, Pittston, PA, for Appellant, Robert K. Dee, Jr.
- For Appellees:
- Karoline Mehalchick, Esq. [Argued], Olvier, Price & Rhodes, Clarks Summit, PA, for Appellee, Borough of Dunmore; Borough of Dunmore Council; Joseph Loftus; Thomas Hennigan; Joseph Talutto; Frank Padula; Leonard Verrastro; Michael Cummings; all individually and as Councilmen.