United States Third Circuit
Johnson v. Tennis, 07-1968
In a case involving the joint bench trial of two alleged conspirators in a murder, in which the judge considered a confession by one defendant implicating the other, denial of petition for habeas relief is affirmed where: 1) the Bruton rule is inapplicable to the incriminating confession of a nontestifying codefendant in a joint bench trial; 2) defendant's constitutional rights were therefore not violated; and 3)defendant's counsel was not ineffective.
Appellate Information
- Decided 11/19/2008
- Published 11/19/2008
Judges
- Before: SLOVITER, FUENTES and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Third Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Cheryl J. Sturm, Esq., Chadds Ford, PA, for Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Joshua S. Goldwert, Assistant District Attorney, (Counsel of Record), Thomas W. Dolgenos, Ronald Eisenberg, Arnold H. Gordon, Lynne Abraham, Office of the District Attorney, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellees.