Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Third Circuit


Johnson v. Tennis, 07-1968

In a case involving the joint bench trial of two alleged conspirators in a murder, in which the judge considered a confession by one defendant implicating the other, denial of petition for habeas relief is affirmed where: 1) the Bruton rule is inapplicable to the incriminating confession of a nontestifying codefendant in a joint bench trial; 2) defendant's constitutional rights were therefore not violated; and 3)defendant's counsel was not ineffective.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 11/19/2008
  • Published 11/19/2008

Judges

  • Before:  SLOVITER, FUENTES and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Third Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Cheryl J. Sturm, Esq., Chadds Ford, PA, for Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Joshua S. Goldwert, Assistant District Attorney, (Counsel of Record), Thomas W. Dolgenos, Ronald Eisenberg, Arnold H. Gordon, Lynne Abraham, Office of the District Attorney, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellees.
Copied to clipboard