Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Third Circuit


In Re: Lucent Death Benefits ERISA Litig., 06-5008, 06-5009

In a putative class-action suit relating to the termination of a pensioner death benefit, dismissal for failure to state a claim is affirmed where the death benefit was an unvested welfare benefit that the employer could terminate without violating ERISA or unilateral contract principles.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 04/16/2008
  • Decided 08/28/2008
  • Published 08/28/2008

Judges

  • Before:  AMBRO, FISHER, and MICHEL, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Third Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • James R. Malone, Jr., Esquire (Argued), Kimberly L. Kimmel, Esquire, Chimicles & Tikellis, Haverford, PA, Counsel for Appellants, Edward Foss and Sarah Conder., Alan M. Sandals, Esquire, Scott M. Lempert, Esquire, Sandals & Associates, Philadelphia, PA, Victoria Quesada, Esquire (Argued), Quesada & Moore, West Hempstead, NY, Counsel for Appellant, Helen P. Lucas., Curtis L. Kennedy, Esquire, Denver, CO, Counsel for Amicus-Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Joseph D. Guarino, Esquire, Epstein, Becker & Green, Newark, NJ, John Houston Pope, Esquire (Argued), Epstein, Becker & Green, New York, NY, Frank C. Morris, Jr., Esquire, Epstein, Becker & Green, Washington, DC, Counsel for Appellee.
Copied to clipboard