United States Third Circuit
US v. Soto, 07-2643
Conviction for aiding and abetting the making of false statements to a federal firearms licensee is affirmed over objections that: 1) the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction; 2) the question of whether the forms filled out by the alleged principal as required by the licensee, on which she had allegedly lied, were statutorily-required records was a jury question; and 3) even if the record-keeping question was a question of law, the forms in question were not required records.
Appellate Information
- Argued 06/05/2008
- Decided 08/19/2008
- Published 08/19/2008
Judges
- Before: AMBRO, CHAGARES and COWEN, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Third Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Daniel I. Siegel, Esq. (Argued), Office of the Federal Public Defender, Wilmington, DE, for Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Eric B. Henson, Esq. (Argued), Robert A. Zauzmer, Esq., Office of the United States Attorney, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellee.