Skip to main content

United States Third Circuit


Cospito v. Attorney Gen. US, 07-1619

An alien's petition for review of an order of removal is denied in part and dismissed in part where: 1) DHS was not collaterally estopped from raising issues in the removal proceeding that were not raised during prior adjustment-of-status proceedings, both because the adjustment proceeding is non-adversarial and because petitioner's fraudulent statements precluded any final adjudication on those issues; and 2) agency's discretionary determination that it would not grant a waiver for petitioner's prior criminal convictions or her failure to disclose previous applications for adjustment of status was based on unreviewable factual findings.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 08/14/2008
  • Published 08/14/2008

Judges

  • Before:  FUENTES, ALDISERT and GARTH, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Third Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Steven A. Morley, Esquire, Morley, Surin & Griffin, Philadelphia, PA, for Petitioner.

  • For Appellees:
  • Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division, David V. Bernal, Assistant Director, Andrew C. Maclachlan, Esquire, United States Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Copied to clipboard