United States Third Circuit
Budget Blinds, Inc. v. White, 06-2610
In a suit arising from alleged violations of a settlement agreement covering a trademark dispute between competing sellers of window blinds, vacatur of a default judgment entered against defendant in the Central District of California is vacated and remanded where: 1) Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6) allows a district court to vacate the judgment of another district court in "extraordinary circumstances," but no such circumstances existed in this case; and 2) additional fact-finding was necessary to determine whether the judgment should be vacated for lack of personal jurisdiction under Rule 60(b)(4).
Appellate Information
- Argued 04/09/2008
- Decided 07/28/2008
- Published 07/28/2008
Judges
- Before: SMITH, HARDIMAN, and COWEN, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Third Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Howard A. Matalon, Esq., Stryker, Tams & Dill, LLP, Newark, NJ, Jeremiah J. Morgan, Esq. (argued), Bryan Cave LLP, Kansas City, MS, for Budget Blinds, Inc., Ronald J. Nelson, Esq. (argued), Warren, NJ, for Valerie White, et al.