United States Third Circuit

Reset A A Font size: Print

US v. Iglesias, 06-4426

Convictions on drugs and weapons charges are affirmed where: 1) there was sufficient evidence to support a conviction; 2) the prior inconsistent statement of a prosecution witness was properly admitted as non-hearsay evidence; and 3) in determining defendant's sentence on a drug conspiracy charge, as opposed to a distribution charge, the district court was not required to deduct drug quantities earmarked for defendant's personal use from the total drug quantity.

Appellate Information

  • Submitted 01/07/2008
  • Decided 07/25/2008
  • Published 07/25/2008

Judges

  • Before:  FISHER, HARDIMAN and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Third Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Cheryl J. Sturm, Chadds Ford, PA, Attorney for Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Robert A. Zauzmer, Ewald Zittlau, Office of United States Attorney, Philadelphia, PA, Attorneys for Appellee.
Copied to clipboard