United States Third Circuit

In a case arising from plaintiff's purchase of credit repair services from defendant alleging it violated its obligations under the Credit Repair Organizations Act (CROA) and state law, grant of defendant's motion to stay the case and compel arbitration on an individual basis is affirmed where: 1) plaintiff's claims are subject to arbitration; and 2) the arbitration provision in this case was not unconscionable.

Appellate Information

• Argued 10/17/2007
• Decided 12/19/2007
• Published 12/19/2007

Judges

• Before:  FISHER, ALDISERT and GREENBERG, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Third Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• James A. Francis (argued), Francis & Mailman, David A. Searles, Donovan Searles, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellant Mary Gay.


• For Appellees:
  
• Carleton O. Strouss, David R. Fine (argued), Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis, Harrisburg, PA, for Appellee Intersections Inc., Christopher D. Thomas, Nixon Peabody, Rochester, NY, for Amicus-Appellee National Organization of Consumer Credit Attorneys.