United States Third Circuit
Valdiviezo-Galdamez v. Attorney Gen. of the US, 06-2080
A petition for review of a denial of Honduran citizen's applications for asylum and related relief is granted where: 1) the IJ's grounds for denying the asylum claim were unsupported by substantial evidence, and a remand was proper for further proceedings and findings; 2) consequently, denial of a withholding claim is also vacated; and 3) as the IJ ignored relevant evidence, and in light of the current standard for proving government "acquiescence" to torture, a remand was required for a CAT claim.
Appellate Information
- Argued 07/10/2007
- Decided 09/07/2007
- Published 09/07/2007
Judges
- Before: RENDELL and AMBRO, Circuit Judges, and SHAPIRO, District Judge.
Court
- United States Third Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Martin P. Duffey [ARGUED], Cozen & O'Connor, Ayodele Gansallo, Hias & Council Migration Service, of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, for Petitioner.
- For Appellees:
- Colette R. Buchanan [ARGUED], Office of the United States Attorney, Newark, NJ, Janice K. Redfern, United States Department of Justice, Office of Immigration, Washington, DC, for Respondent.