United States Third Circuit

Defendants convictions and a sentence for bank fraud-related offenses are affirmed over claims of error regarding: 1) a variance between the indictment and the proof at trial; 2) the admission of one defendant's prior conviction; 3) a decision allowing the government to cross-examine one defendant about a consumer complaint and a criminal complaint against her; 4) the sufficiency of the evidence on a charge of conspiracy to engage in a monetary transaction involving the proceeds of criminally derived property; and 5) the reasonableness of a sentence.

Appellate Information

• Decided 08/20/2007
• Published 08/20/2007

Judges

• Before:  BARRY, FUENTES, and GARTH, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Third Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Rena Rothfeld, Livingston, NJ, for Appellant Carleen Greenidge., Kevin F. Carlucci, Office of Federal Public Defender, Newark, NJ, for Appellant Mario Pallitta., Henry E. Klingeman, Klingeman Law, Florham Park, NJ, for Appellant Joseph DiGregorio., George S. Leone, Sabrina G. Comizzoli, Office of United States Attorney, Newark, NJ, for United States of America.