Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Third Circuit


New Jersey Transit Corp. v. Harsco Corp., 06-3507

In an action brought by a transit agency raising claims for negligence, product liability, and breach of warranties arising from a contract to procure a track geometry inspection vehicle, summary judgment for the manufacturer/seller and other defendants is affirmed as, at the time the vehicle was destroyed by fire, all warranties had expired since there was no implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose, and the implied warranty of merchantability was displaced by a paragraph's express warranty after one year.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 06/28/2007
  • Decided 08/07/2007
  • Published 08/07/2007

Judges

  • Before: BARRY, FUENTES, and GARTH, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Third Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • David W. Smith [Argued], Kevin J. Hughes, Cozen & O'Connor, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • John J. Weinholtz [Argued], David H. Tennant, Nixon Peabody LLP, Buffalo, NY, David W. Field, Lowenstein Sandler PC, Roseland, NJ, for Appellee Harsco Corp., E. Graham Robb, John C. Falls, John A. Miller, Jr. [Argued], Christie, Pabarue, Mortensen and Young, PC, Philadelphia, PA, Counsel for Appellees Detroit Diesel Corp., W.W. Williams Southeast, Inc. et al.
Copied to clipboard