United States Third Circuit

Jury verdicts for plaintiffs on their claims for unlawful retaliation under the Pennsylvania Human Rights Act are affirmed over claims contesting the admission of certain evidence at trial, the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the verdicts, the consistency of those verdicts with particular findings made by the jury on the plaintiffs' other claims for relief, and the plaintiffs' right to have a jury decide their PHRA claims.

Appellate Information

• Argued 03/06/2007
• Decided 08/03/2007
• Published 08/03/2007

Judges

• Before:  SLOVITER and AMBRO, Circuit Judges, THOMPSON, District Judge.

Court

• United States Third Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Melanie M. Kennedy, Esquire (Argued) Cozen & O'Connor, Jessamyne M. Simon, Esquire Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney, Philadelphia, PA for Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Nancy D. Wasser, Esquire (Argued) Philadelphia, PA, for Appellees.