Skip to main content

United States Third Circuit


Hartmann v. Carroll, 04-4550

Dismissal of an inmate's habeas petition as untimely is affirmed as petitioner's motion for a sentence reduction under Delaware Superior Court Criminal Rule 35(b) did not meet the tolling requirements of 28 U.S.C. section 2244(d)(2).

Appellate Information

  • Argued 02/01/2007
  • Decided 07/09/2007
  • Published 07/10/2007

Judges

  • Before:  BARRY and ROTH, Circuit Judges and IRENAS , District Judge.

Court

  • United States Third Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Christopher R. Nestor, Esquire (Argued), David R. Fine Esquire, Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis, Harrisburg, PA, Counsel for Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Elizabeth R. McFarlan, Esquire (Argued), Deputy Attorney General, Delaware Department of Justice, Wilmington, DE, Counsel for Appellees.
Copied to clipboard