Skip to main content

United States Third Circuit


Riel v. City of Bradford, 05-4425

In an action brought by home and business owners who were issued criminal citations by a Pennsylvania city for displaying signage on their property without obtaining permits, a ruling upholding the constitutionality of the city's sign ordinances under which plaintiffs were cited is affirmed as: 1) the district court correctly held that the ordinances are content-neutral and permissible under the First Amendment; 2) it did not err by failing to strike down the ordinances on overbreadth grounds; and 3) an ordinance was not unconstitutionally vague.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 12/12/2006
  • Decided 05/03/2007
  • Published 05/03/2007

Judges

  • Before: FISHER and CHAGARES, Circuit Judges, and BUCKWALTER, District Judge.

Court

  • United States Third Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Philip B. Friedman, Ambrose, Friedman & Weichler, Erie, PA, Witold J. Walczak (Argued), American Civil Liberties Union, Pittsburgh, PA, for Appellants.

  • For Appellees:
  • Richard A. Lanzillo (Argued), Knox, McLaughlin, Gornall & Sennett, Erie, PA, for Appellee.
Copied to clipboard