United States Third Circuit

In a challenge to the constitutionality of a city ordinance which requires that prospective users of public land file an application, pay certain fees, and agree to a variety of conditions before permission for use of the land is granted, summary judgment in favor of the city is reversed in part where a reimbursement provision of the ordinance was unconstitutional under the First Amendment.

Appellate Information

• Argued 01/30/2007
• Decided 03/21/2007
• Published 03/21/2007

Judges

• Before BARRY and ROTH, Circuit Judges, and DEBEVOISE, District Judge.

Court

• United States Third Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Richard Barrett, Esq., (Argued), Learned, MS, Counsel for Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• James D. Young, Esq., (Argued), Lavery, Faherty, Young & Patterson, Harrisburg, PA, Donald B. Hoyt, Esq., Blakely, Yost, Bupp & Rausch, York, PA, Counsel for Appellee.