United States Third Circuit

Dismissal of suit, claiming that defendant's collection letter violates the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act's ban on false, misleading or deceptive communications, is vacated as the facts pled by plaintiff, if proven, state a claim upon which a court might grant relief.

Appellate Information

• Argued 06/01/2006
• Decided 09/29/2006
• Published 09/29/2006

Judges

• FUENTES, Circuit Judge., Before AMBRO, FUENTES, and GREENBERG, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Third Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Cary L. Flitter (Argued), Lundy, Flitter, Beldecos & Berger, P.C., Narberth, PA, David A. Searles, Donovan Searles, LLC, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Thomas W. Dymek, Stradley, Ronon, Stevens & Young, LLP, Philadelphia, PA, Thomas J. Cahill, Joshua M. Rubins (Argued), Daniel G. Gurfein, Satterlee Stephens Burke & Burke LLP, New York, NY, for Appellees.