United States Third Circuit

A conviction and sentence for wire fraud, mail fraud, and making false statements is affirmed over claims that: 1) defendant's plea was entered unknowingly and was thus invalid; 2) that the final sentence imposed was unreasonable; and 3) that a superseding indictment included "superfluous, irrelevant, and prejudicial language."

Appellate Information

• Decided 07/11/2006
• Published 07/11/2006

Judges

• Before FISHER, GREENBERG and LOURIE, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Third Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Amara S. Chaudhry, Norristown, PA, Attorney for Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Christopher R. Hall, Office of United States Attorney, Philadelphia, PA, Attorney for Appellee.