United States Third Circuit
Luntungan v. Attorney Gen. of the US, 05-2397
A petition for review from a denial of a motion to reopen removal proceedings is denied over petitioner's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel where another motion to review, filed prior to the motion under review, had given petitioner a fair chance to be heard even if he had received ineffective assistance of counsel on his first motion to reopen.
Appellate Information
- Argued 04/03/2006
- Decided 06/05/2006
- Published 06/05/2006
Judges
- PER CURIAM., Before RENDELL, SMITH, and BECKER , Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Third Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Lawrence Spivak (Argued), New York, NY, Attorney for Petitioner.
- For Appellees:
- Linda S. Wernery, Janice K. Redfern (Argued), William C. Peachey, United States Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Attorneys for Respondents.