United States Third Circuit

Defendant's conviction and sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm is affirmed over his claim of erroneous denial of his suppression motion based on a claim that police did not have probable cause to believe that defendant was located and residing at the residence of his wife.

Appellate Information

• Decided 07/03/2006
• Published 07/05/2006

Judges

• AMBRO, Circuit Judge., Before AMBRO and STAPLETON, Circuit Judges, and STAGG, District Judge.

Court

• United States Third Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Stuart M. Wilder, Esquire, Pratt, Brett & Luce, Doylestown, PA, for Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Patrick L. Meehan, United States Attorney, Robert A. Zauzmer, Assistant United States Attorney, Chief of Appeals, Thomas P. Hogan, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Office of United States Attorney, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellee.