United States Third Circuit

Reset A A Font size: Print

In re: Grand Jury Investigation, 06-1474

In an ongoing grand jury investigation of suspected federal criminal activity, an order enforcing and refusing to quash a subpoena involving documents and testimony of a party's attorney relating to potential obstruction of justice is affirmed where the appeal was not moot, there was no abuse of discretion in the decision to enforce the subpoena, and the scope of the order was properly tailored to cover only subjects implicated by the crime-fraud exception.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 03/09/2006
  • Decided 04/21/2006
  • Published 04/21/2006

Judges

  • Before: SLOVITER, AMBRO and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Third Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • William H. Lamb (Argued), Joel L. Frank, James C. Sargent, Jr., Susan C. Mangold, Scott R. Withers, Lamb McErlane PC, West Chester, PA, for Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Patrick L. Meehan, United States Attorney, Robert A. Zauzmer, Assistant United States Attorney, Chief of Appeals, John J. Pease III (Argued), Assistant United States Attorney, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellee.
Copied to clipboard