United States Third Circuit

Denial of summary judgment for plaintiff on its garnishment action brought in connection with a confirmation of an arbitration award in a contract case is reversed where ancillary jurisdiction could properly be exercised over the garnishment action, and summary judgment for plaintiff should have been entered.

Appellate Information

• Argued 11/14/2005
• Decided 02/13/2006
• Published 02/13/2006

Judges

• Before ROTH, FUENTES and BECKER, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Third Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Dennis R. Suplee, (Argued), Nancy Winkelman, Stephen A. Fogdall, Schnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis LLP, Philadelphia, PA, James D. Zirin, (Argued), Sidley Austin Brown & Wood LLP, New York, NY, for IFC Interconsult, AG., Kenneth I. Levin, (Argued), Matthew J. Hank, Pepper Hamilton LLP, Philadelphia, PA, for Safeguard International Fund, L.P., Paul R. Rosen, (Argued), Bruce Bellingham, Spector Gadon & Rosen, PC, Philadelphia, PA, for Safeguard International Partners, LLC.