United States Third Circuit

Summary judgment in favor of defendant on plaintiffs' unjust enrichment claims is reversed where there is a material dispute of fact to whether defendant exploited his fiduciary position for personal gain when he caused the issuance of notes.

Appellate Information

• Argued 02/14/2005
• Decided 07/12/2005
• Published 07/12/2005

Judges

• Before SLOVITER, ALDISERT and STAPLETON, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Third Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Edward A. Friedman (Argued), Andrew W. Goldwater, Robert D. Kaplan, Daniel B. Rapport, Friedman, Kaplan, Seiler & Adelman, New York, N.Y. and Emily A. Stubbs, Friedman, Kaplan, Seiler & Adelman, Newark, NJ and Lawrence C. Ashby, Philip Trainer, Jr., Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington, DE, for Appellants.


• For Appellees:
  
• Robert E. Zimet (Argued), Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, New York, NY, for Appellees.